Are bone conduction headphones the future of Cycling Safety?

[JJMarsh]

I've been testing Shokz headphones on my daily commutes and weekend rides, and the open-ear design is a game-changer for urban cycling. Unlike traditional earbuds that block traffic noise, these let me hear everything from car horns to approaching pedestrians while still enjoying my playlist. The fit stays secure even when I'm sweating buckets, and they work perfectly with my helmet straps.

The only downside? Wind noise becomes noticeable above 20mph, and audiophiles might miss deep bass. But for safety-conscious riders, that tradeoff seems worth it. Has anyone else tried bone conduction tech for cycling? How do they compare to regular headphones for long-distance rides?

[rydabent]

IMO anything that puts noise in your head while cycling is a safety hazard.

[meamoantonio]

Love the concept but I think they break too easily, maybe they're still in their infancy stage and I think we'll be seeing more robust and better quality bone conduction headphones down the line but today, 2 purchases should be enough until they make really better ones after a few iterations of the product

[JJMarsh]

(08-22-2025, 02:56 AM)meamoantonio Wrote:  Love the concept but I think they break too easily, maybe they're still in their infancy stage and I think we'll be seeing more robust and better quality bone conduction headphones down the line but today, 2 purchases should be enough until they make really better ones after a few iterations of the product

Thanks for sharing your experience! You’ve raised a really important point about durability. I’ve been using the latest Shokz OpenRun Pro model for about a year now, and they’ve held up surprisingly well through rain, sweat, and even a few drops. The build quality has definitely improved compared to earlier generations.

That said, I totally get your hesitation. Have you found any other brands or models that you feel are more robust? Or are you sticking with traditional headphones for now? Curious to hear what works for you!

[Anton Lee]

(08-12-2025, 07:42 AM)JJMarsh Wrote:  I've been testing Shokz headphones on my daily commutes and weekend rides, and the open-ear design is a game-changer for urban cycling. Unlike traditional earbuds that block traffic noise, these let me hear everything from car horns to approaching pedestrians while still enjoying my playlist. The fit stays secure even when I'm sweating buckets, and they work perfectly with my helmet straps.

The only downside? Wind noise becomes noticeable above 20mph, and audiophiles might miss deep bass. But for safety-conscious riders, that tradeoff seems worth it. Has anyone else tried bone conduction tech for cycling? How do they compare to regular headphones for long-distance rides?

I think the future development will be better. I am currently using nank bone conduction headphones, and the experience is quite good. I have been using it for a year. I found an article that said it can definitely give you some suggestions.
https://naenka.com/blogs/products/best-open-ear-headphones-for-summer-workouts

[SPINMAN]

I agree with the safety issue and the difficulty of hearing surrounding traffic when riding as a road cyclist. I am referring to having both ears plugged with in-ear buds. The Shoks are out of ear, allowing for hearing road noise and traffic. If I ride alone, I use one Bose bud in my right ear, but on group rides, I pay attention.

[Anton Lee]

(08-12-2025, 07:42 AM)JJMarsh Wrote:  I've been testing Shokz headphones on my daily commutes and weekend rides, and the open-ear design is a game-changer for urban cycling. Unlike traditional earbuds that block traffic noise, these let me hear everything from car horns to approaching pedestrians while still enjoying my playlist. The fit stays secure even when I'm sweating buckets, and they work perfectly with my helmet straps.

The only downside? Wind noise becomes noticeable above 20mph, and audiophiles might miss deep bass. But for safety-conscious riders, that tradeoff seems worth it. Has anyone else tried bone conduction tech for cycling? How do they compare to regular headphones for long-distance rides?

I also think the Shokz headphones are very good. Now many companies are using bone conduction technology to make headphones. I have also compared other brands. I feel that the Nank brand headphones are also very good and worth buying.

[rydabent]

Anything that interferes with hearing traffic sounds around you is unsafe.

[Mordof]

(08-12-2025, 07:42 AM)JJMarsh Wrote:  I've been testing Shokz headphones on my daily commutes and weekend rides, and the open-ear design is a game-changer for urban cycling. Unlike traditional earbuds that block traffic noise, these let me hear everything from car horns to approaching pedestrians while still enjoying my playlist. The fit stays secure even when I'm sweating buckets, and they work perfectly with my helmet straps.

The only downside? Wind noise becomes noticeable above 20mph, and audiophiles might miss deep bass. But for safety-conscious riders, that tradeoff seems worth it. Has anyone else tried bone conduction tech for cycling? How do they compare to regular headphones for long-distance rides?

The wind noise issue makes sense though—I’ve heard others mention that above certain speeds the whooshing can drown out the music a bit.

[SPINMAN]

I just did an installation update on a SHOKZ display in best buy today. I am a consumer Goods and Electronics installer and merchandiser - Since they first came out they seem to be thicker and well maybe better made. My attention was drawn to the "Open Swim Pro" that can be worn in the pool. I still have not tried them. If I ride with music it would be by myself and not a group ride and wear one ear bud in the right ear.

[Brassboy77]

I love my Shokz. I have 2 of them. Only way to have some music and hear cars. I also have Garmin Varia rear radar which beaps through my Garmin computer and shows car approaching.

[Mordof]

(08-12-2025, 07:42 AM)JJMarsh Wrote:  I've been testing Shokz headphones on my daily commutes and weekend rides, and the open-ear design is a game-changer for urban cycling. Unlike traditional earbuds that block traffic noise, these let me hear everything from car horns to approaching pedestrians while still enjoying my playlist. The fit stays secure even when I'm sweating buckets, and they work perfectly with my helmet straps.

The only downside? Wind noise becomes noticeable above 20mph, and audiophiles might miss deep bass. But for safety-conscious riders, that tradeoff seems worth it. It’s kind of like choosing a casino site with fast payouts - you might not get every feature under the sun, but the speed and convenience make all the difference. Has anyone else tried bone conduction tech for cycling? How do they compare to regular headphones for long-distance rides?

For long-distance rides, I’ve found bone conduction tech keeps the ears cooler and reduces fatigue compared to in-ear or over-ear headphones, but if you’re chasing rich sound quality, traditional headphones still win.

[nhbarto]

I use the Shokz headphones. I think they’re wonderful. I guess high winds would be a problem, but I haven’t noticed yet. It might depend on the aerodynamics of one’s helmet.

I’m wondering if they are considered earphones and could get the wearer a fine in locales that ban earphones.

(08-12-2025, 07:42 AM)JJMarsh Wrote:  I've been testing Shokz headphones on my daily commutes and weekend rides, and the open-ear design is a game-changer for urban cycling. Unlike traditional earbuds that block traffic noise, these let me hear everything from car horns to approaching pedestrians while still enjoying my playlist. The fit stays secure even when I'm sweating buckets, and they work perfectly with my helmet straps.

The only downside? Wind noise becomes noticeable above 20mph, and audiophiles might miss deep bass. But for safety-conscious riders, that tradeoff seems worth it. Has anyone else tried bone conduction tech for cycling? How do they compare to regular headphones for long-distance rides?