Location: Northern Florida, USA
(08-06-2024, 03:14 AM)GirishH Wrote: Tagging @Jesper here..
Personally, I thought the size was primarily so that bike fit the rider right. I wasn't aadare that there's more to it..
Let's see what other's say..
Wishing you the very best with your new hardtail, @Flowrider
I am so "old school" (70s klunkers, 80s rigid mtb's) that my input here probably does not apply. I use my cycling experience/inexperience to guide me while riding off-road. I presently still ride my mid '80s rigid frame mtb so I assume 26" wheels. If I do not think I can safely traverse an area I simply carry the bike just as I do with my road bike when riding a more cyclocross terrain. When i am out in the wilderness and am descending (often without any defined trail) there is not a concern about "racing" down the hill since I climbed up the bloody thing to take a look around, and even going down I am still exploring. My bike handles fine for my needs and my only concern is tire pressure when going from road to trail/wilderness since in general I am road cycling to the trail and not driving.
I am ReapThaWimpWind and I view the world from a plexiglass window in my lower abdomen because my head is a sigmoidoscope always shoved up my....
Hey man, at your budget I would definitely go with a 27.5 trail hardtail. it rolls over obstacles better than a 26. You'll have more options in that price range with 27.5 too. As for mullet, I don't think you need the extra rollover of a 29 rear on a hardtail unless you're doing super rocky descents.