Have questions or want to discuss cycling? Join Now or Sign In to participate in the BikeRide community.


The great thing about trikes
#21
(06-30-2025, 04:29 PM)nelly Wrote:  I always come from my rides in an excellent mood. That is the main reason for me

I do also; but from any invigorating activity; regardles of wheel number.

Me thinks this thread should have been called "The Great Thing about being Outdoors and being Active regardless of How You Do It or ₩hat You Do It On" since it applies to more than just wheeled transportation and its advantages and inherent disadvantages (which the author neglects to state) regarding a specific mode of recreation.
  Reply
#22
(07-01-2025, 11:10 AM)Jesper Wrote:  Me thinks this thread should have been called "The Great Thing about being Outdoors and being Active regardless of How You Do It or ₩hat You Do It On" since it applies to more than just wheeled transportation and its advantages and inherent disadvantages (which the author neglects to state) regarding a specific mode of recreation.

Hear, hear!
  Reply
#23
(05-20-2025, 01:28 PM)Criminal Wrote:  
(05-12-2025, 10:15 AM)rydabent Wrote:  Why worry about a five foot wall, when a great percentage of the time DF riders are staring down at their front wheel.

Hello cyclists,
The quoted statement is blatantly false. Obviously common sense and how people actually ride their bikes shows the remark as folly regardless of attempts at rationalizing it.

This is how lies and disinformation gets spread. I am glad someone exposed it. Why say something that is just ludricous when you put any thought into the statement

I have ridden a 2 wheel recumbent. I WAS looking at the my top of front wheel, as it was just below my chin level; but what do I know? Not even a close contest to whether I looked at my tire on an upright compared to the recumbent (which front wheel kicks crap up in your face while you are looking at it; not fun!).
Just observe almost any DF rider, their face is held in the down facing direction.
  Reply
#24
(07-08-2025, 10:40 AM)rydabent Wrote:  Just observe almost any DF rider, their face is held in the down facing direction.

The truth avenger is here again! Not sure if the quoted text is from someone with dememtia, senility, brain cell damage from drugs, exhaust fumes, partial asphyxiation, or just plain obstinance in face of the facts.

Here is a photo from THIS WEBSITE. Notice where all those "DIAMOND FRAME" bicyclists are looking? Forward rydabentnevermind; ever forward!. Even with the low res. photo, I do not see one with "their face is held in the down facing direction". Not one rydeyourbent! Not even one ridearidiculousbentoutofshapeopinion!

I did not do any search; I just went to THIS WEBSITE'S HOMEPAGE and found multiple photos of cyclists with not one looking at their front wheel; except if you count an mtb rider eyeing a technical course feature.

Again, I provide facts, and not some curmudgeoned bias based on a the fact that you admittedly rode your diamond frame bike looking down at your front wheel 50% of the time unlike those of us riding normally and looking forward to view the road, hazards, and wonders before us. No wonder @rydabent likes his/her/their trike since he/she/them was looking down when riding his/her/their bicycle, and never got to view what "almost any rider" regularly sees while we ride with our EYES looking forward. This amateur thinks that head angle equates to EYE DIRECTION; I guess his/her/their eyes do not move in the skull like most people. I apologize if that is your condition; "locked eyeball syndrome". Must suck; but if not then your statements are utter wacko.

Go ahead rydemy butt; refute the photo! I know; it was staged. Right? Those riders were all told in advance to "look up" just to disprove rydesintripe continued and baseless statements being made over and over in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary (must be related to a certain misleading public official I regularly hear about). Unfortunately for you, I will be there to tell the truth and display the truth. Please; stop riding those trikes if you stop making sense to others as you are clearly making no sense here. Save your brain and breath the cleaner air of upright cycling.

What's missing in the photos rydacrab? Cyclists looking down, that's what!


Attached Files Image(s)
       
Ride Fast, Be Safe!
Howard
  Reply
#25
Name calling cant overcome fact.
  Reply
#26
(07-09-2025, 10:12 AM)rydabent Wrote:  Name calling cant overcome fact.

The fact that since you spent 50% or more of your time looking at your front wheel while riding a non-recumbent, and that your mind is so biased now that you think the majority of normal cyclists do the same even with overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Again, you deflect and refuse to admit to spreading a falsehood through cycling community here even wirh photos posted on this site contradicting your claims. Probably all that exhaust causing the issues; recommend and activated charcoal mask with N95 filtration.

So again we state the facts that: 1) recumbent trikes have reduced visual range due to lower average eye level height compared to normal cyclists, and 2) normal cyclists look out at the road and scenery while riding (per photos, poll, and common sense); not at their front wheel as someone spreading disinformation repeatedly states in contradiction to reality.
Ride Fast, Be Safe!
Howard
  Reply
#27
(07-13-2025, 02:59 AM)Criminal Wrote:  
(07-09-2025, 10:12 AM)rydabent Wrote:  Name calling cant overcome fact.

The fact that since you spent 50% or more of your time looking at your front wheel while riding a non-recumbent, and that your mind is so biased now that you think the majority of normal cyclists do the same even with overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Again, you deflect and refuse to admit to spreading a falsehood through cycling community here even wirh photos posted on this site contradicting your claims. Probably all that exhaust causing the issues; recommend and activated charcoal mask with N95 filtration.

So again we state the facts that: 1) recumbent trikes have reduced visual range due to lower average eye level height compared to normal cyclists, and 2) normal cyclists look out at the road and scenery while riding (per photos, poll, and common sense); not at their front wheel as someone spreading disinformation repeatedly states in contradiction to reality.

What you say is not true. On a DF bike you lean forward, and if your neck is straight with your spine, YOU ARE LOOKING DOWN. To look forward you have to crane our neck upward in an unnatural position. On long rides that ends up giving you neck and shoulder pain. Been there, done that.
  Reply
#28
(07-13-2025, 09:45 AM)rydabent Wrote:  What you say is not true. On a DF bike you lean forward, and if your neck is straight with your spine, YOU ARE LOOKING DOWN. To look forward you have to crane our neck upward in an unnatural position. On long rides that ends up giving you neck and shoulder pain. Been there, done that.

Again, you refuse to even look a photos of regular cyclists looking forward even while THEIR FREAKING SPINES ARE LEANING FORWARD. THEY ARE NOT LOOKING DOWN! Isn't it amazing how the human body can articulate at varoius angles and yet we (except rydabrick) can still be looking straight forward with our eyes! Astounding!

Do you not have eyeballs that articulate like the rest of the world? Sorry that your physical condition did not allow you to enjoy cycling on a normal bike like the rest of us looking forward WITH OUR EYEBALLS (not our spine!), unlike yourself, and safely enjoying the view while cycling in an aerodynamic position for hours at a time without discomfort to our necks and back. Over 5 decades riding a drop bar bike and I still do not feel sore in my body evwn while loojing foreard for for hours at a time riding in an more aerodynamic than upright cyclists. I guess it must be the same way for motorcycle riders too (oops, me again); who ride leaning forward, but looking forward and wearing a much heavier helmet when doing so. Some comsic event help us should rydabench ever get on a motorbike as he/she/they is looking down at their front wheel 50% of the time and cannot ride without pain from looking forward. Yes, all bicycle and motorcycles riders in the world cannot possibly be proof the rydablank is wrong and is merely applying transference of his/her/their personal condition upon everyone else.

I will come back after summer; I need to go out and ride more so I can see what re-trlcycle loungers and riders are missing, and laugh with joy knowing I can do it without pain or looking at my front wheel like rydabent admits he/she/they did when painfully riding his/her/their normal bike.

Do actually what you say does apply to normal cyclists. Again, you are deluded into thinking that how you rode a normal bicycle (looking down at your front wheel 50% or more of the time) while experiencing pain due to poor physical condition or personal anatomy is how the majority of normal cyclists also do and suffer from doing. You are nuts and I will comtinue to counter your BS statements with fact and knowledge. I will not bother with imagery since are too blind either physically or psychologically to admit to and acknowledge that proof that sits right under your nose.
Ride Fast, Be Safe!
Howard
  Reply
#29
(07-13-2025, 01:38 PM)Criminal Wrote:  
(07-13-2025, 09:45 AM)rydabent Wrote:  What you say is not true. On a DF bike you lean forward, and if your neck is straight with your spine, YOU ARE LOOKING DOWN. To look forward you have to crane our neck upward in an unnatural position. On long rides that ends up giving you neck and shoulder pain. Been there, done that.

Again, you refuse to even look a photos of regular cyclists looking forward even while THEIR FREAKING SPINES ARE LEANING FORWARD. THEY ARE NOT LOOKING DOWN! Isn't it amazing how the human body can articulate at varoius angles and yet we (except rydabrick) can still be looking straight forward with our eyes! Astounding!

Do you not have eyeballs that articulate like the rest of the world? Sorry that your physical condition did not allow you to enjoy cycling on a normal bike like the rest of us looking forward WITH OUR EYEBALLS (not our spine!), unlike yourself, and safely enjoying the view while cycling in an aerodynamic position for hours at a time without discomfort to our necks and back. Over 5 decades riding a drop bar bike and I still do not feel sore in my body evwn while loojing foreard for for hours at a time riding in an more aerodynamic than upright cyclists. I guess it must be the same way for motorcycle riders too (oops, me again); who ride leaning forward, but looking forward and wearing a much heavier helmet when doing so. Some comsic event help us should rydabench ever get on a motorbike as he/she/they is looking down at their front wheel 50% of the time and cannot ride without pain from looking forward. Yes, all bicycle and motorcycles riders in the world cannot possibly be proof the rydablank is wrong and is merely applying transference of his/her/their personal condition upon everyone else.

I will come back after summer; I need to go out and ride more so I can see what re-trlcycle loungers and riders are missing, and laugh with joy knowing I can do it without pain or looking at my front wheel like rydabent admits he/she/they did when painfully riding his/her/their normal bike.

Do actually what you say does apply to normal cyclists. Again, you are deluded into thinking that how you rode a normal bicycle (looking down at your front wheel 50% or more of the time) while experiencing pain due to poor physical condition or personal anatomy is how the majority of normal cyclists also do and suffer from doing. You are nuts and I will comtinue to counter your BS statements with fact and knowledge. I will not bother with imagery since are too blind either physically or psychologically to admit to and acknowledge that proof that sits right under your nose.
Your "proof" photo proves my point. It was taken at a low angle (down), so the riders appear to be looking forward, but they are actually looking down. It is the natural position on a DF bike. Your argument really dont hold water.
  Reply
#30
(07-14-2025, 10:04 AM)rydabent Wrote:  
(07-13-2025, 01:38 PM)Criminal Wrote:  
(07-13-2025, 09:45 AM)rydabent Wrote:  What you say is not true. On a DF bike you lean forward, and if your neck is straight with your spine, YOU ARE LOOKING DOWN. To look forward you have to crane our neck upward in an unnatural position. On long rides that ends up giving you neck and shoulder pain. Been there, done that.

Again, you refuse to even look a photos of regular cyclists looking forward even while THEIR FREAKING SPINES ARE LEANING FORWARD. THEY ARE NOT LOOKING DOWN! Isn't it amazing how the human body can articulate at varoius angles and yet we (except rydabrick) can still be looking straight forward with our eyes! Astounding!

Do you not have eyeballs that articulate like the rest of the world? Sorry that your physical condition did not allow you to enjoy cycling on a normal bike like the rest of us looking forward WITH OUR EYEBALLS (not our spine!), unlike yourself, and safely enjoying the view while cycling in an aerodynamic position for hours at a time without discomfort to our necks and back. Over 5 decades riding a drop bar bike and I still do not feel sore in my body evwn while loojing foreard for for hours at a time riding in an more aerodynamic than upright cyclists. I guess it must be the same way for motorcycle riders too (oops, me again); who ride leaning forward, but looking forward and wearing a much heavier helmet when doing so. Some comsic event help us should rydabench ever get on a motorbike as he/she/they is looking down at their front wheel 50% of the time and cannot ride without pain from looking forward. Yes, all bicycle and motorcycles riders in the world cannot possibly be proof the rydablank is wrong and is merely applying transference of his/her/their personal condition upon everyone else.

I will come back after summer; I need to go out and ride more so I can see what re-trlcycle loungers and riders are missing, and laugh with joy knowing I can do it without pain or looking at my front wheel like rydabent admits he/she/they did when painfully riding his/her/their normal bike.

Do actually what you say does apply to normal cyclists. Again, you are deluded into thinking that how you rode a normal bicycle (looking down at your front wheel 50% or more of the time) while experiencing pain due to poor physical condition or personal anatomy is how the majority of normal cyclists also do and suffer from doing. You are nuts and I will comtinue to counter your BS statements with fact and knowledge. I will not bother with imagery since are too blind either physically or psychologically to admit to and acknowledge that proof that sits right under your nose.
Your "proof" photo proves my point. It was taken at a low angle (down), so the riders appear to be looking forward, but they are actually looking down. It is the natural position on a DF bike. Your argument really dont hold water.

Okay world rydanent is officially a freaking senile nutcase!
Now he/she/they is trying to take obvious photos of cyclists looking forward and rationalize his/her/their falacy by now blaming it on camera angles. Wharlt a freak. Must be related to a US "president" that lies and contorts truth to appease a twisted mind.

Obviously, I could provide tons of photos showing cyclists not looking at their front wheel like rydablock does 50% of the time when he/she/they ride a non-recumbent bike because he/she/they are not a cyclist. Normal average everyday cyclists watch where they are riding (as evidenced clearly in photos!!). I hope he/she/they did not teach their kids to ride the same way as themselves; though if probably help sort out some bad genes from gene pool with the family crashing into stuff while looking at their front wheels like rydabung does.

So now rydabird, I will post those photos as a separate thread and get the rational (this does not apply to you rydabilge since you are not of rational though in your present condition; just read what the sane folks say!) opinions as to where the cyclists in the photos are directing their gaze and if camera angle trickery is actually changing the perspective of the view making cyclists who, though in reality are looking forward, can somehow without logic be reinterpretted by the irrational into making them think that all those cyclists are actually looking down at their front wheel. I know it sounds insane, but when dealing with the insane all one can do is keep throwing their perverse thought process in front of the public, continue to allow themselves to be exposed as an irrational thinker, and as a warning for others to avoid taking what they state as gospel truth in the light of overwhelming evidence contrary to the irrational claim by rydablip.

This will be more fun and more wasted server space for the platform; but oh well, rydabong needs to continually be exposed as irrational and not thinking clearly while trying to defend his/her/their insane statements with more insane statements about cyclists looking at their front wheels tje majority of the time which is blantantly false as we all know. First rydabling went with "looking at front wheel" to just "looking down" so even wording is being changed slightly. Just another sign of dementia. And he/she/they continue to think that head angle is related to eye and vision angle. As previously mentioned; it is believed by myself that rydaboink cannot move his/her/their eyes in their sockets and thus are struck looking only in the direction of where the skull is oriented. I do feel sorry for thosecwith the "glued eyeball" syndrome; but do not assume that majority of those of us with articulating eyeballs are looking in the direction of where our akulls are oriented. We, those with articulating eyeballs, have the tremendous super hero abililty to have our heads tilted SLIGHTLY downwards and yet still be able to look straigjt forward! Amazing! Try it rydaburp; maybe your eyeballs just need some exercise to get those eyeball muscles working again. First tilt your head forward at about 45° and then, using all of your mental capacity (even the insane part), attempt to roll your eyeballs to look straight forward. Remember, do not move your head, only your eyeballs. Practice this daily rydaboob and you to will ne able to ride an actual bicycle while looking forward regardless of whether your head is tilted down or not. Do not become frustrated rydabeak since it is a very difficult skill to master; but the entire cycling community us here to support your the training of your brain to make you a safer cyclist should you ever consider riding a machine again instead of riding rolling furniture or a tricycle.

Of course, I again will be hit with another insane comment from rydabrake, but that is what this thread has turned into: a search for truth and logic and the esposure of one (and only one!) tricycle owner's (probably cannot even ride with that "frozen eyeball" problem) continual spewing of lies and irrational thought. As of yet I have not seen one comment supporting any of the insane claims made by rydabraut. One would think that another sane person would have observed and experienced the same thing to the degree that rydaboat has; and yet not one comment supporting rydabunion's baseless claims.

Sorry, I was delayed in my summer vacation so got a couple comments to toss out before R&R.

Oh crap, another photo of cyclists not looking down while riding. Especially notice that the rear rider has his head tilted down, but his eyes are clearly looking straight ahead. Clearly neither of these riders suffered from the dreaded "frozen eyeball" syndrome that rydabridge is afflicted with (and apparently thinks all cyclists have). Oh wait; it is just more photographic manipulation; that photohrapher was a genius!




Keep riding as you are folks since I know you are all looking forward as there have been no reports of mass casulties around the world caused by cyclists looking down at their front wheel!

And now rydaburrito I will expose your foolishness elsewhere.


Attached Files Image(s)
   
Ride Fast, Be Safe!
Howard
  Reply
#31
When you are arguing a point, the one that resorts to name calling is almost always the loser.

As a member of the local bike club, and helped at sag stops, seeing the actions of DF riders when they stop indicates their bikes are not any where near comfortable as some insist.
  Reply
#32
(06-05-2025, 12:06 PM)Criminal Wrote:  
(06-05-2025, 10:52 AM)rydabent Wrote:  
(06-04-2025, 04:44 PM)Criminal Wrote:  
(06-04-2025, 10:15 AM)rydabent Wrote:  But the simple fact about trikes remain, they have 3 main things going for them, comfort, view, and ease of use.

But even simpler facts about bicycles remain, as they have more than 3 main things going for them; but comfort, ease of use, and view are certainly among them.

Comfort on a DF?? DF bikes have many advantages in several situations, but comfort is NOT one of them.

If GURPF bikes are so uncomfortable then why are billions of people of ALL ages (yes even 70 yrs old and older) riding them without screaming in agony? How is it possible that an 80 year old can do a century an feel okay and another younger rider would be in pain after the same long ride? Simple; different bodies! It has nothing to do with the vehicle, it has to do with the human. Some people are more comfortable standing; but just because you are more comfortable sitting you make the generalization that a chair is more comfortable than standing for everyone, and yet it is only your opinion. It disregards everyone else's personal preferences that do not align with your own preferences. You like you trike; we get it! Just stop with the biased generalizations that do not apply to the vast majority of cyclists who can see the views just fine, are not looking down at their front wheel, and who are perfectly happy and comfortable riding something other than a recumbent. Again, you take the narrow view that because YOU are more comfortable riding your "lazyboy-on--wheels" that it must be true for everyone. Unfortunately, that is not true. I am comfortable with a non-recumbent bike and not a recumbent bike. I know because I have done it! So just one person automatically sinks your statement about a certain vehicle being more comfortablecthan another. You like recline, I like to sit; if we are both comfortable than how can it be that one is more comfortable than the other. Because they are not; merely a personal preference like creamy or crunchy peanut butter; same product serving the same purpose but PREFERRED ON A PERNAL BASIS, and the preference has nothing to with one being better than the other. A true statement would be that recumbent tricycles MIGHT be more comfortable for some cyclists due to age, injuries, and personal preference. That is a reasonable statement! Just like the reasonable statement that cyclists riding GURPF bikes have a better range of view (per national safety studies, math, and common sense) than do recumbent or low eye level vehicles. Recumbents ranked around 11th just above wheelchairs!) out of 14 specific vehicles where average eye levels were rated. GURPF bikes and upright trikes both rated at 3rd best visibility. Those who still think you have the best view by having your eyes closers to the ground must be studying crawling insects, and are not cycling a Generally Upright Riding Position Frame bike where your eyes being higher than those riding any recumbent can more readily see the fabulous vistas. Funny anecdote from a friend riding out in Rockies where there are many wonserful views and overlooks. He stated that while riding with another GURPF bike rider and stopping to check out the views and take a photo he noticed that they rarely ever got off their bikes just merely stopped, looked, chatted, and moved on; whereas recumbent riders needed to get off the couch to be able to see the same views. Rrcumbent riders could not adequately view over safety barriers, walls, fences, plant growth, etc. and needed to stand to see to same thing others could see while stopped never having to dismount their bikes to get the same views. Amazing!

So we reach an undisputable fact that recumbent riders have a more limited view than GURPF bike riders as noted by independent observations, personal experience, and scientific studies. Given all that rydabent will still continue to deny reality and inaccurately state that recumbent tricyclists have the better view; but now you know the truth regardless of what he/she/they might say using only a biased opinion and not using empirical knowledge or logic.
Ultra long diatribes will not convince anyone that DF bicycles are as comfortable as a bent or trike. On the other hand, every bent rider knows the limitations of bents and trikes. Bents and trikes are best used on paved trails or hiways, not single track or mountain riding.
  Reply
#33
(06-04-2025, 04:44 PM)Criminal Wrote:  
(06-04-2025, 10:15 AM)rydabent Wrote:  But the simple fact about trikes remain, they have 3 main things going for them, comfort, view, and ease of use.

But even simpler facts about bicycles remain, as they have more than 3 main things going for them; but comfort, ease of use, and view are certainly among them.

Comfort??? On a DF seat your whole body is supported maybe by 15 square inches. On my Trike by body is supported by approx 250 square inches. Less pressure equals less pain.

What IS the biggest complaint about DF bikes, the seat.

(07-20-2025, 09:43 AM)Criminal Wrote:  
(07-14-2025, 10:04 AM)rydabent Wrote:  
(07-13-2025, 01:38 PM)Criminal Wrote:  
(07-13-2025, 09:45 AM)rydabent Wrote:  What you say is not true. On a DF bike you lean forward, and if your neck is straight with your spine, YOU ARE LOOKING DOWN. To look forward you have to crane our neck upward in an unnatural position. On long rides that ends up giving you neck and shoulder pain. Been there, done that.

Again, you refuse to even look a photos of regular cyclists looking forward even while THEIR FREAKING SPINES ARE LEANING FORWARD. THEY ARE NOT LOOKING DOWN! Isn't it amazing how the human body can articulate at varoius angles and yet we (except rydabrick) can still be looking straight forward with our eyes! Astounding!

Do you not have eyeballs that articulate like the rest of the world? Sorry that your physical condition did not allow you to enjoy cycling on a normal bike like the rest of us looking forward WITH OUR EYEBALLS (not our spine!), unlike yourself, and safely enjoying the view while cycling in an aerodynamic position for hours at a time without discomfort to our necks and back. Over 5 decades riding a drop bar bike and I still do not feel sore in my body evwn while loojing foreard for for hours at a time riding in an more aerodynamic than upright cyclists. I guess it must be the same way for motorcycle riders too (oops, me again); who ride leaning forward, but looking forward and wearing a much heavier helmet when doing so. Some comsic event help us should rydabench ever get on a motorbike as he/she/they is looking down at their front wheel 50% of the time and cannot ride without pain from looking forward. Yes, all bicycle and motorcycles riders in the world cannot possibly be proof the rydablank is wrong and is merely applying transference of his/her/their personal condition upon everyone else.

I will come back after summer; I need to go out and ride more so I can see what re-trlcycle loungers and riders are missing, and laugh with joy knowing I can do it without pain or looking at my front wheel like rydabent admits he/she/they did when painfully riding his/her/their normal bike.

Do actually what you say does apply to normal cyclists. Again, you are deluded into thinking that how you rode a normal bicycle (looking down at your front wheel 50% or more of the time) while experiencing pain due to poor physical condition or personal anatomy is how the majority of normal cyclists also do and suffer from doing. You are nuts and I will comtinue to counter your BS statements with fact and knowledge. I will not bother with imagery since are too blind either physically or psychologically to admit to and acknowledge that proof that sits right under your nose.
Your "proof" photo proves my point. It was taken at a low angle (down), so the riders appear to be looking forward, but they are actually looking down. It is the natural position on a DF bike. Your argument really dont hold water.

Okay world rydanent is officially a freaking senile nutcase!
Now he/she/they is trying to take obvious photos of cyclists looking forward and rationalize his/her/their falacy by now blaming it on camera angles. Wharlt a freak. Must be related to a US "president" that lies and contorts truth to appease a twisted mind.

Obviously, I could provide tons of photos showing cyclists not looking at their front wheel like rydablock does 50% of the time when he/she/they ride a non-recumbent bike because he/she/they are not a cyclist. Normal average everyday cyclists watch where they are riding (as evidenced clearly in photos!!). I hope he/she/they did not teach their kids to ride the same way as themselves; though if probably help sort out some bad genes from gene pool with the family crashing into stuff while looking at their front wheels like rydabung does.

So now rydabird, I will post those photos as a separate thread and get the rational (this does not apply to you rydabilge since you are not of rational though in your present condition; just read what the sane folks say!) opinions as to where the cyclists in the photos are directing their gaze and if camera angle trickery is actually changing the perspective of the view making cyclists who, though in reality are looking forward, can somehow without logic be reinterpretted by the irrational into making them think that all those cyclists are actually looking down at their front wheel. I know it sounds insane, but when dealing with the insane all one can do is keep throwing their perverse thought process in front of the public, continue to allow themselves to be exposed as an irrational thinker, and as a warning for others to avoid taking what they state as gospel truth in the light of overwhelming evidence contrary to the irrational claim by rydablip.

This will be more fun and more wasted server space for the platform; but oh well, rydabong needs to continually be exposed as irrational and not thinking clearly while trying to defend his/her/their insane statements with more insane statements about cyclists looking at their front wheels tje majority of the time which is blantantly false as we all know. First rydabling went with "looking at front wheel" to just "looking down" so even wording is being changed slightly. Just another sign of dementia. And he/she/they continue to think that head angle is related to eye and vision angle. As previously mentioned; it is believed by myself that rydaboink cannot move his/her/their eyes in their sockets and thus are struck looking only in the direction of where the skull is oriented. I do feel sorry for thosecwith the "glued eyeball" syndrome; but do not assume that majority of those of us with articulating eyeballs are looking in the direction of where our akulls are oriented. We, those with articulating eyeballs, have the tremendous super hero abililty to have our heads tilted SLIGHTLY downwards and yet still be able to look straigjt forward! Amazing! Try it rydaburp; maybe your eyeballs just need some exercise to get those eyeball muscles working again. First tilt your head forward at about 45° and then, using all of your mental capacity (even the insane part), attempt to roll your eyeballs to look straight forward. Remember, do not move your head, only your eyeballs. Practice this daily rydaboob and you to will ne able to ride an actual bicycle while looking forward regardless of whether your head is tilted down or not. Do not become frustrated rydabeak since it is a very difficult skill to master; but the entire cycling community us here to support your the training of your brain to make you a safer cyclist should you ever consider riding a machine again instead of riding rolling furniture or a tricycle.

Of course, I again will be hit with another insane comment from rydabrake, but that is what this thread has turned into: a search for truth and logic and the esposure of one (and only one!) tricycle owner's (probably cannot even ride with that "frozen eyeball" problem) continual spewing of lies and irrational thought. As of yet I have not seen one comment supporting any of the insane claims made by rydabraut. One would think that another sane person would have observed and experienced the same thing to the degree that rydaboat has; and yet not one comment supporting rydabunion's baseless claims.

Sorry, I was delayed in my summer vacation so got a couple comments to toss out before R&R.

Oh crap, another photo of cyclists not looking down while riding. Especially notice that the rear rider has his head tilted down, but his eyes are clearly looking straight ahead. Clearly neither of these riders suffered from the dreaded "frozen eyeball" syndrome that rydabridge is afflicted with (and apparently thinks all cyclists have). Oh wait; it is just more photographic manipulation; that photohrapher was a genius!




Keep riding as you are folks since I know you are all looking forward as there have been no reports of mass casulties around the world caused by cyclists looking down at their front wheel!

And now rydaburrito I will expose your foolishness elsewhere.
They are looking up since someone is right ahead of them taking their picture.

Dont believe everything you hear from the racer boyz setting around the bike shop.
  Reply
#34
I saw an 80yro triathlete casually overtake me at 35kph once so I think even if we age as long as you're actively training you will never lose the strength, but of course trikes are fun for errand rides like if you have to do the grocery and do something else other than ride, your "real" bike wouldn't cut it for stuff like this haha
  Reply
#35
What this thread has evolved into is the demonstration of how one tricycle rider's faultering mind is set on denying the truth regardless of any evidence provided.
Apparently now cyclists only look up when a camera is present. Ha ha ha!
Next it will a hot dog vendor, or a streaker, or maybe a bridge collapse. One can rationalize anything when the grey matter starts to go bad.

Funny, but not one person has agreed with this singular tricycle rider yet. I am waiting for just one rational person to state: "Why yes, they are looking forward not because they are in a race and need to view the roadway and competition, but instead only because of a photographer that is not even in their way".
Of course, having done professional photography I am aware of different lens sizes, doublers, zooms, telephoto lens, etc. that allow photos to appear to be taken at a much closer distance than they actually are (nevermind that the photo angle is offset from the rider's direction of travel).

Bring it on sir/madam/person. Everyone here knows you are just going to spew out more laughable comments that in the end have absolutely nothing to do with reality. Old age is fun; you can just say what you want and everyone apparently feels sorry for that person since it is not worth the time trying to convince anyone not in their right mind.

Public service announcement: Warning, riding a tricycle affects logical thought leading one to create fantastical rationalizations regardless of reality. Not! It only happens to one rider who can no longer think clearly due to biases they have long ago created and are no longer able to get past since they are never going to admit to being wrong when presented with evidence multiple times that clearly refutes their misguided belief.

Everyone safely enjoy your holidays! See you in a couple months to comment on the next irrational and biased blurb to emit from only one person thus far.

This forward looking rider must be looking at another photographer, or maybe there is a carrot on a stick in front of him that he is trying procure. Regardless, the faultering mind will provide us all another goofy and baseless comment.


Attached Files Image(s)
   
Ride Fast, Be Safe!
Howard
  Reply
#36
Notice is the last picture how the DF rider has his head craned up in an unnatural position, if held there for a long time will result in neck and shoulder pain.

"Real cyclist" that sit around the bike shop, and tell stories about racing are a cult. If you dont ride one of the bikes on their approved list, and ride using all their rules, YOU are not a real cyclist. Since recumbent bikes and trike do not fit into their scene, never have ridden one for very long, they dismiss them almost completely. They simply will not admit that trikes especially have 3 main things going for them, comfort, view, and ease of use. They simply refuse to admit that probably 95% of the bike rides ridden, are simply for fun, exercise, and pleasure. People simply ride what feels comfortable to them. They dont care one whit about "cult rules" when riding.
  Reply
#37
(05-20-2025, 01:28 PM)Criminal Wrote:  
(05-12-2025, 10:15 AM)rydabent Wrote:  Why worry about a five foot wall, when a great percentage of the time DF riders are staring down at their front wheel.

Hello cyclists,
The quoted statement is blatantly false. Obviously common sense and how people actually ride their bikes shows the remark as folly regardless of attempts at rationalizing it.

This is how lies and disinformation gets spread. I am glad someone exposed it. Why say something that is just ludricous when you put any thought into the statement

I have ridden a 2 wheel recumbent. I WAS looking at the my top of front wheel, as it was just below my chin level; but what do I know? Not even a close contest to whether I looked at my tire on an upright compared to the recumbent (which front wheel kicks crap up in your face while you are looking at it; not fun!).

(07-20-2025, 09:43 AM)Criminal Wrote:  
(07-14-2025, 10:04 AM)rydabent Wrote:  
(07-13-2025, 01:38 PM)Criminal Wrote:  
(07-13-2025, 09:45 AM)rydabent Wrote:  What you say is not true. On a DF bike you lean forward, and if your neck is straight with your spine, YOU ARE LOOKING DOWN. To look forward you have to crane our neck upward in an unnatural position. On long rides that ends up giving you neck and shoulder pain. Been there, done that.

Again, you refuse to even look a photos of regular cyclists looking forward even while THEIR FREAKING SPINES ARE LEANING FORWARD. THEY ARE NOT LOOKING DOWN! Isn't it amazing how the human body can articulate at varoius angles and yet we (except rydabrick) can still be looking straight forward with our eyes! Astounding!

Do you not have eyeballs that articulate like the rest of the world? Sorry that your physical condition did not allow you to enjoy cycling on a normal bike like the rest of us looking forward WITH OUR EYEBALLS (not our spine!), unlike yourself, and safely enjoying the view while cycling in an aerodynamic position for hours at a time without discomfort to our necks and back. Over 5 decades riding a drop bar bike and I still do not feel sore in my body evwn while loojing foreard for for hours at a time riding in an more aerodynamic than upright cyclists. I guess it must be the same way for motorcycle riders too (oops, me again); who ride leaning forward, but looking forward and wearing a much heavier helmet when doing so. Some comsic event help us should rydabench ever get on a motorbike as he/she/they is looking down at their front wheel 50% of the time and cannot ride without pain from looking forward. Yes, all bicycle and motorcycles riders in the world cannot possibly be proof the rydablank is wrong and is merely applying transference of his/her/their personal condition upon everyone else.

I will come back after summer; I need to go out and ride more so I can see what re-trlcycle loungers and riders are missing, and laugh with joy knowing I can do it without pain or looking at my front wheel like rydabent admits he/she/they did when painfully riding his/her/their normal bike.

Do actually what you say does apply to normal cyclists. Again, you are deluded into thinking that how you rode a normal bicycle (looking down at your front wheel 50% or more of the time) while experiencing pain due to poor physical condition or personal anatomy is how the majority of normal cyclists also do and suffer from doing. You are nuts and I will comtinue to counter your BS statements with fact and knowledge. I will not bother with imagery since are too blind either physically or psychologically to admit to and acknowledge that proof that sits right under your nose.
Your "proof" photo proves my point. It was taken at a low angle (down), so the riders appear to be looking forward, but they are actually looking down. It is the natural position on a DF bike. Your argument really dont hold water.

Okay world rydanent is officially a freaking senile nutcase!
Now he/she/they is trying to take obvious photos of cyclists looking forward and rationalize his/her/their falacy by now blaming it on camera angles. Wharlt a freak. Must be related to a US "president" that lies and contorts truth to appease a twisted mind.

Obviously, I could provide tons of photos showing cyclists not looking at their front wheel like rydablock does 50% of the time when he/she/they ride a non-recumbent bike because he/she/they are not a cyclist. Normal average everyday cyclists watch where they are riding (as evidenced clearly in photos!!). I hope he/she/they did not teach their kids to ride the same way as themselves; though if probably help sort out some bad genes from gene pool with the family crashing into stuff while looking at their front wheels like rydabung does.

So now rydabird, I will post those photos as a separate thread and get the rational (this does not apply to you rydabilge since you are not of rational though in your present condition; just read what the sane folks say!) opinions as to where the cyclists in the photos are directing their gaze and if camera angle trickery is actually changing the perspective of the view making cyclists who, though in reality are looking forward, can somehow without logic be reinterpretted by the irrational into making them think that all those cyclists are actually looking down at their front wheel. I know it sounds insane, but when dealing with the insane all one can do is keep throwing their perverse thought process in front of the public, continue to allow themselves to be exposed as an irrational thinker, and as a warning for others to avoid taking what they state as gospel truth in the light of overwhelming evidence contrary to the irrational claim by rydablip.

This will be more fun and more wasted server space for the platform; but oh well, rydabong needs to continually be exposed as irrational and not thinking clearly while trying to defend his/her/their insane statements with more insane statements about cyclists looking at their front wheels tje majority of the time which is blantantly false as we all know. First rydabling went with "looking at front wheel" to just "looking down" so even wording is being changed slightly. Just another sign of dementia. And he/she/they continue to think that head angle is related to eye and vision angle. As previously mentioned; it is believed by myself that rydaboink cannot move his/her/their eyes in their sockets and thus are struck looking only in the direction of where the skull is oriented. I do feel sorry for thosecwith the "glued eyeball" syndrome; but do not assume that majority of those of us with articulating eyeballs are looking in the direction of where our akulls are oriented. We, those with articulating eyeballs, have the tremendous super hero abililty to have our heads tilted SLIGHTLY downwards and yet still be able to look straigjt forward! Amazing! Try it rydaburp; maybe your eyeballs just need some exercise to get those eyeball muscles working again. First tilt your head forward at about 45° and then, using all of your mental capacity (even the insane part), attempt to roll your eyeballs to look straight forward. Remember, do not move your head, only your eyeballs. Practice this daily rydaboob and you to will ne able to ride an actual bicycle while looking forward regardless of whether your head is tilted down or not. Do not become frustrated rydabeak since it is a very difficult skill to master; but the entire cycling community us here to support your the training of your brain to make you a safer cyclist should you ever consider riding a machine again instead of riding rolling furniture or a tricycle.

Of course, I again will be hit with another insane comment from rydabrake, but that is what this thread has turned into: a search for truth and logic and the esposure of one (and only one!) tricycle owner's (probably cannot even ride with that "frozen eyeball" problem) continual spewing of lies and irrational thought. As of yet I have not seen one comment supporting any of the insane claims made by rydabraut. One would think that another sane person would have observed and experienced the same thing to the degree that rydaboat has; and yet not one comment supporting rydabunion's baseless claims.

Sorry, I was delayed in my summer vacation so got a couple comments to toss out before R&R.

Oh crap, another photo of cyclists not looking down while riding. Especially notice that the rear rider has his head tilted down, but his eyes are clearly looking straight ahead. Clearly neither of these riders suffered from the dreaded "frozen eyeball" syndrome that rydabridge is afflicted with (and apparently thinks all cyclists have). Oh wait; it is just more photographic manipulation; that photohrapher was a genius!




Keep riding as you are folks since I know you are all looking forward as there have been no reports of mass casulties around the world caused by cyclists looking down at their front wheel!

And now rydaburrito I will expose your foolishness elsewhere.

Denial is not a river in Egypt.
  Reply
#38
(07-08-2025, 06:52 PM)Criminal Wrote:  
(07-08-2025, 10:40 AM)rydabent Wrote:  Just observe almost any DF rider, their face is held in the down facing direction.

The truth avenger is here again! Not sure if the quoted text is from someone with dememtia, senility, brain cell damage from drugs, exhaust fumes, partial asphyxiation, or just plain obstinance in face of the facts.

Here is a photo from THIS WEBSITE. Notice where all those "DIAMOND FRAME" bicyclists are looking? Forward rydabentnevermind; ever forward!. Even with the low res. photo, I do not see one with "their face is held in the down facing direction". Not one rydeyourbent! Not even one ridearidiculousbentoutofshapeopinion!

I did not do any search; I just went to THIS WEBSITE'S HOMEPAGE and found multiple photos of cyclists with not one looking at their front wheel; except if you count an mtb rider eyeing a technical course feature.

Again, I provide facts, and not some curmudgeoned bias based on a the fact that you admittedly rode your diamond frame bike looking down at your front wheel 50% of the time unlike those of us riding normally and looking forward to view the road, hazards, and wonders before us. No wonder @rydabent likes his/her/their trike since he/she/them was looking down when riding his/her/their bicycle, and never got to view what "almost any rider" regularly sees while we ride with our EYES looking forward. This amateur thinks that head angle equates to EYE DIRECTION; I guess his/her/their eyes do not move in the skull like most people. I apologize if that is your condition; "locked eyeball syndrome". Must suck; but if not then your statements are utter wacko.

Go ahead rydemy butt; refute the photo! I know; it was staged. Right? Those riders were all told in advance to "look up" just to disprove rydesintripe continued and baseless statements being made over and over in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary (must be related to a certain misleading public official I regularly hear about). Unfortunately for you, I will be there to tell the truth and display the truth. Please; stop riding those trikes if you stop making sense to others as you are clearly making no sense here. Save your brain and breath the cleaner air of upright cycling.

What's missing in the photos rydacrab? Cyclists looking down, that's what!

Trikes 1 DF bikes 0------------------------it was a trike that was rode to the South Pole.
  Reply
#39
@rydabent Sir, you are looking foolish in your own post by bickering. I suggest you just stop since you are not advancing your cause.

You have made it quite well known that you love your trike and there is nothing wrong with that. But you are ignoring some basic facts both pro and con and you are merely rehashing your point without endearing anyone to it.

I hope you heed my advice and let a dead horse be put to rest. Time to move on to brighter and more positive things here.

I wish you luck and safety in your cycling endeavors.
Take care, Jesper

PS. No need to reply to my comment. As I said just put it to rest which is what I am doing by ignoring this thread from now on as nothing good is coming from it. I will ne'er read it regardless since this thread is no longer about "The great thing about trikes", but is instead about one persons neverending quest to make a specific mode of transportation seem infallible even though it is not. Same thing applies to the other redundant trike thread.
  Reply
#40
(01-26-2026, 09:36 AM)rydabent Wrote:  
(05-20-2025, 01:28 PM)Criminal Wrote:  
(05-12-2025, 10:15 AM)rydabent Wrote:  Why worry about a five foot wall, when a great percentage of the time DF riders are staring down at their front wheel.

Hello cyclists,
The quoted statement is blatantly false. Obviously common sense and how people actually ride their bikes shows the remark as folly regardless of attempts at rationalizing it.

This is how lies and disinformation gets spread. I am glad someone exposed it. Why say something that is just ludricous when you put any thought into the statement

I have ridden a 2 wheel recumbent. I WAS looking at the my top of front wheel, as it was just below my chin level; but what do I know? Not even a close contest to whether I looked at my tire on an upright compared to the recumbent (which front wheel kicks crap up in your face while you are looking at it; not fun!).

(07-20-2025, 09:43 AM)Criminal Wrote:  
(07-14-2025, 10:04 AM)rydabent Wrote:  
(07-13-2025, 01:38 PM)Criminal Wrote:  
(07-13-2025, 09:45 AM)rydabent Wrote:  What you say is not true. On a DF bike you lean forward, and if your neck is straight with your spine, YOU ARE LOOKING DOWN. To look forward you have to crane our neck upward in an unnatural position. On long rides that ends up giving you neck and shoulder pain. Been there, done that.

Again, you refuse to even look a photos of regular cyclists looking forward even while THEIR FREAKING SPINES ARE LEANING FORWARD. THEY ARE NOT LOOKING DOWN! Isn't it amazing how the human body can articulate at varoius angles and yet we (except rydabrick) can still be looking straight forward with our eyes! Astounding!

Do you not have eyeballs that articulate like the rest of the world? Sorry that your physical condition did not allow you to enjoy cycling on a normal bike like the rest of us looking forward WITH OUR EYEBALLS (not our spine!), unlike yourself, and safely enjoying the view while cycling in an aerodynamic position for hours at a time without discomfort to our necks and back. Over 5 decades riding a drop bar bike and I still do not feel sore in my body evwn while loojing foreard for for hours at a time riding in an more aerodynamic than upright cyclists. I guess it must be the same way for motorcycle riders too (oops, me again); who ride leaning forward, but looking forward and wearing a much heavier helmet when doing so. Some comsic event help us should rydabench ever get on a motorbike as he/she/they is looking down at their front wheel 50% of the time and cannot ride without pain from looking forward. Yes, all bicycle and motorcycles riders in the world cannot possibly be proof the rydablank is wrong and is merely applying transference of his/her/their personal condition upon everyone else.

I will come back after summer; I need to go out and ride more so I can see what re-trlcycle loungers and riders are missing, and laugh with joy knowing I can do it without pain or looking at my front wheel like rydabent admits he/she/they did when painfully riding his/her/their normal bike.

Do actually what you say does apply to normal cyclists. Again, you are deluded into thinking that how you rode a normal bicycle (looking down at your front wheel 50% or more of the time) while experiencing pain due to poor physical condition or personal anatomy is how the majority of normal cyclists also do and suffer from doing. You are nuts and I will comtinue to counter your BS statements with fact and knowledge. I will not bother with imagery since are too blind either physically or psychologically to admit to and acknowledge that proof that sits right under your nose.
Your "proof" photo proves my point. It was taken at a low angle (down), so the riders appear to be looking forward, but they are actually looking down. It is the natural position on a DF bike. Your argument really dont hold water.

Okay world rydanent is officially a freaking senile nutcase!
Now he/she/they is trying to take obvious photos of cyclists looking forward and rationalize his/her/their falacy by now blaming it on camera angles. Wharlt a freak. Must be related to a US "president" that lies and contorts truth to appease a twisted mind.

Obviously, I could provide tons of photos showing cyclists not looking at their front wheel like rydablock does 50% of the time when he/she/they ride a non-recumbent bike because he/she/they are not a cyclist. Normal average everyday cyclists watch where they are riding (as evidenced clearly in photos!!). I hope he/she/they did not teach their kids to ride the same way as themselves; though if probably help sort out some bad genes from gene pool with the family crashing into stuff while looking at their front wheels like rydabung does.

So now rydabird, I will post those photos as a separate thread and get the rational (this does not apply to you rydabilge since you are not of rational though in your present condition; just read what the sane folks say!) opinions as to where the cyclists in the photos are directing their gaze and if camera angle trickery is actually changing the perspective of the view making cyclists who, though in reality are looking forward, can somehow without logic be reinterpretted by the irrational into making them think that all those cyclists are actually looking down at their front wheel. I know it sounds insane, but when dealing with the insane all one can do is keep throwing their perverse thought process in front of the public, continue to allow themselves to be exposed as an irrational thinker, and as a warning for others to avoid taking what they state as gospel truth in the light of overwhelming evidence contrary to the irrational claim by rydablip.

This will be more fun and more wasted server space for the platform; but oh well, rydabong needs to continually be exposed as irrational and not thinking clearly while trying to defend his/her/their insane statements with more insane statements about cyclists looking at their front wheels tje majority of the time which is blantantly false as we all know. First rydabling went with "looking at front wheel" to just "looking down" so even wording is being changed slightly. Just another sign of dementia. And he/she/they continue to think that head angle is related to eye and vision angle. As previously mentioned; it is believed by myself that rydaboink cannot move his/her/their eyes in their sockets and thus are struck looking only in the direction of where the skull is oriented. I do feel sorry for thosecwith the "glued eyeball" syndrome; but do not assume that majority of those of us with articulating eyeballs are looking in the direction of where our akulls are oriented. We, those with articulating eyeballs, have the tremendous super hero abililty to have our heads tilted SLIGHTLY downwards and yet still be able to look straigjt forward! Amazing! Try it rydaburp; maybe your eyeballs just need some exercise to get those eyeball muscles working again. First tilt your head forward at about 45° and then, using all of your mental capacity (even the insane part), attempt to roll your eyeballs to look straight forward. Remember, do not move your head, only your eyeballs. Practice this daily rydaboob and you to will ne able to ride an actual bicycle while looking forward regardless of whether your head is tilted down or not. Do not become frustrated rydabeak since it is a very difficult skill to master; but the entire cycling community us here to support your the training of your brain to make you a safer cyclist should you ever consider riding a machine again instead of riding rolling furniture or a tricycle.

Of course, I again will be hit with another insane comment from rydabrake, but that is what this thread has turned into: a search for truth and logic and the esposure of one (and only one!) tricycle owner's (probably cannot even ride with that "frozen eyeball" problem) continual spewing of lies and irrational thought. As of yet I have not seen one comment supporting any of the insane claims made by rydabraut. One would think that another sane person would have observed and experienced the same thing to the degree that rydaboat has; and yet not one comment supporting rydabunion's baseless claims.

Sorry, I was delayed in my summer vacation so got a couple comments to toss out before R&R.

Oh crap, another photo of cyclists not looking down while riding. Especially notice that the rear rider has his head tilted down, but his eyes are clearly looking straight ahead. Clearly neither of these riders suffered from the dreaded "frozen eyeball" syndrome that rydabridge is afflicted with (and apparently thinks all cyclists have). Oh wait; it is just more photographic manipulation; that photohrapher was a genius!




Keep riding as you are folks since I know you are all looking forward as there have been no reports of mass casulties around the world caused by cyclists looking down at their front wheel!

And now rydaburrito I will expose your foolishness elsewhere.

Denial is not a river in Egypt.

senile nut case???????????????? What ever, but this senile nut case rides in absolute comfort compared to some one riding a DF bike.

BTW buy your bikes at garage sales. A lot of people decide that it looks fun to ride, and go out and buy a bike. They ride it a few times, decide it is to much work, and a definitely a big pain in the ass.
  Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread
Author
Replies
Views
Last Post

Forum Jump:

[-]
10 Latest Posts
Cycle packing or learning from other lon...
Today 09:14 AM
How do you jump?
Today 12:37 AM
New Jersey's New E-bike Law
02-09-2026 03:12 PM
Hello, everyone!
02-09-2026 03:10 AM
Rim Depth Preference
02-08-2026 12:52 AM
How to keep your bicycle safe?
02-07-2026 12:26 PM
How can I fuse & wire U7 headlights to Y...
02-06-2026 12:28 PM
Anyone tried Montella Cycling? What size...
02-02-2026 04:50 AM
Cheating on your bicycle
02-02-2026 03:16 AM
The great thing about trikes
02-01-2026 10:18 AM

[-]
Join BikeRide on Strava
Feel free to join if you are on Strava: www.strava.com/clubs/bikeridecom

[-]
Top 5 Posters This Month
no avatar 1. Jesper
18 posts
no avatar 2. Flowrider
16 posts
no avatar 3. GirishH
16 posts
no avatar 4. rydabent
12 posts
no avatar 5. meamoantonio
11 posts