Hi, I'm new to this forum, so I hope I' m posting this in the right place.
As a matter of general interest, is it any more difficult to change a 7 speed freewheel
to a freehub and cassette setup than by simply changing the wheel and putting the appropriate freehub and cassette on it? I've only recently found out there's a difference, and I'm currious to know more about it.
If you get a new wheel and cassette that should so it (assuming they are both shimano compatible or something else compatible so they will work with your shifter.) The wheel will come with the freehub. You'll want to get a new chain at the same time and you'll probably have to adjust the rear shifting, but normally nothing other than that. Make sure they have the same axle spacing.
A wheel made for cassette has a stronger axle than one made for a freewheel. Higher end wheels will usually be made for cassette. But getting a cassette wheel does not necessarily mean you're getting a better wheel.
It's a big change just to go to cassette unless you have something else you're trying to achieve. Why the change?
A cassette/freehub type hub has the wheel bearings farther apart. That supports the axle better so you are less likely to get a bent axle. But note that bikes had the freewheel style for about 100 years, so it's not exactly some horrible design.
Might be worth swapping over if you had to replace the wheel for some other reason. But not worth changing just to change.
I agree. The Sidewinder is a lower end bike, and upgrading it very much would not be cost efficient over getting a better quality used bike. Unless the wheel goes bad and you want to replace it (AND the shifters are compatible with the cassette you choose) then you'd be better off selling the Sidewinder and buying a better used bike.
I understand the sentimental attachment one can develop, but if you replace the crankset, rear wheel, etc. is it really the same bike? If you paint the frame it won't even look like the same bike.
I dunno much about or what year his bike is, but for me my newest bike the stable is a 1997 down to 89'. not including the ole rod brake roadster. I would rather throw a couple hundred on reviving a 20 year old Trek, Specialized, Univega, ..etc. Steel is real! If I bought a basket case for $40 and threw $200 at it I would still have a nicer riding bike than spending $600 on a new bike plus built the way I want. Also when done right my money invested is not so wasted because I retain more value. what I put in I could sell at the worst a break even. I sell 20 year old bikes all the time for 75% of original retail and even above original retail. In his situation it is not about retaining value or money, just a facelift and learning how to do it. I say go for it then. It is only money, I wasted more money over the years on supposed not so fine,fine dining!
There are two kinds of people in the world, "Those who help themselves to people, and those who help people!"
Both these peeceding replies make good points. I'd have to concider what to change, which is why I posted the question. I' d want to have some specific goal in mind with whatever I'd be doing. It'll all come together eventually.
As for the second reply, that's exactly right, working on a bike is a heck of a lot of fun just on its own, besides riding it. I've started posting on this forum because I jusr finished doing a pretty major tune up, replacing cables, brake pads, trueing wheels, ect., and I'd forgotten how much I enjoyed it.
Oh yeah, and painting it might make it look different, but that's O.K.., see that would liberate the true inner spirit of the machine!
Sorry for your loss Nigel, but I think you can handle it! Yea, for now I have been riding the newer stuff,
I ended up selling my Univega, had too many in the stable. I try to keep an even number around 13 or 15 at any given time! ha
There are two kinds of people in the world, "Those who help themselves to people, and those who help people!"