Have questions or want to discuss cycling? Join Now or Sign In to participate in the BikeRide community.

New: Take Part in the May Giveaway for a Change to Win the Thruster 27.5 Retrograde BMX Cruiser Bike


Front derailleur/chainring gap
#1
I am trying to upgrade my 50/34T 105 chainset to an Ultegra 6800 46/36T system with all the appropriate 6800 components
Unfortunately there is not enough adjustment on the braze on front derailleur to enable me to achieve the recommended 1 - 3mm gap between the top of the big ring teeth and the bottom of the derailleur. The closest I can get is 4.5mm due to the smaller diameter of the 46t chainring.
I am not sure how critical this is but if it is critical to the smooth working of the system then the only solution I can see is to buy a new 50/34T Ultegra chainset which I don't really want to do.
Any ideas anyone ?
  Reply
#2
Is there enough metal around the hole to file slots in it so you can get closer?
Craig Domingue - East Texas Hick
  Reply
#3
Will a 48-34 do the trick - offers a more useful high end with a 11 or 12 tooth small cog.
  Reply
#4
I had the same problem.

I removed an Ultegra 52/39 chainset and replaced it with a 50/34 compact chainset. The gap between the front derailleur and the new 50T chainring is around 5mm, and I can't lower the derailleur any further.

Front shifting with this new set-up isn't great, but its good enough to do the job. Occasionally, after clicking the shifter lever, I may need 2 or 3 turns of the pedals to shift the front chainring, it depends on the power that I'm exerting at the time. Not ideal to pull back at a critical moment, but its worth the sacrifice in order to have the compact chainrings and so save my knees from long-term damage.
  Reply
#5
(01-22-2015, 06:51 PM)GingerTart Wrote:  ....., but its worth the sacrifice in order to have the compact chainrings and so save my knees from long-term damage.

Interesting; my knees have the opposite issue: they do not like the 32% difference between the 50 and 34 tooth rings, the 25% difference between 52 and 39 is much better. The 46/34 combination provides a 26% difference, probably chosen to be as close to the same percentage as 52/39.

I am planning on changing from 50/34 to 52/39 on my WT, and compensating with larger cogs on the cassette (currently 7 speed 13-26; going to 8 speed custom 14-32 [13-26 minus the 13T and 14T cogs, with a 32T add and 14T first position cog]). The 52-14 combo is about the same as 50-13 and the 39-32 is a bit lower than 34-26.
Nigel
  Reply


Possibly Related Threads...

Forum Jump:

[-]
10 Latest Posts
Specialized bicycle post issue
Today 06:21 AM
What did your first bicycle mean to you?
Yesterday 11:38 AM
Doctors are Prescribing Cycling
Yesterday 11:34 AM
Getting back into riding, bike instead o...
05-22-2024 12:55 AM
What was your first bicycle?
05-21-2024 07:27 PM
Philodo H8
05-20-2024 12:50 PM
Opinions on Bergamont bikes?
05-20-2024 11:58 AM
Expensive bikes with crappy wheels
05-20-2024 06:44 AM
Dork disc - remove it or keep it?
05-20-2024 06:36 AM
interpreting serial numbers
05-19-2024 01:55 PM

[-]
Join BikeRide on Strava
Feel free to join if you are on Strava: www.strava.com/clubs/bikeridecom

[-]
Top 5 Posters This Month
no avatar 1. Jesper
32 posts
no avatar 2. Nutribun
21 posts
no avatar 3. enkei
20 posts
no avatar 4. Burrobabe
14 posts
no avatar 5. GirishH
13 posts