(07-28-2023, 11:47 AM)enkei Wrote: (07-26-2023, 08:13 PM)Jesper Wrote: Well folks it looks as if the "Maxfoot" company is doing a "soft" marketing campaign on the website. It is interesting that no specs or models have yet to be given; nor any comparisons to other brands' models.
Not just Maxfoot. Urban Drift is at it, too.
Interesting!
I do not really read much regarding different e-bike brands since most are still fairly new to the marketplace overall and have not proven their worth regarding longevity and parts availability 5 to 10 years down the road. I still consider cycling under your own power regardless of whether casual or competitive completely different than e-bike riding which I classify as a motorized sport. I am not denigrating their usage or riders, but even with "pedal assist" it is not the same thing as self-powered cycling.
I read this thread and the other related thread started by the same person due to the title "E-Bikes: Pioneering a Green Revolution in Transportation", but I was immediately struck by the fact that the OP (who also started the other "BRAND I WILL NOT NAME AGAIN" thread as well) brought the attention to that specific brand (no model ever provided) when the thread (which sounds like the title of a thesis study) was just a generalization of e-bikes and their ecologocal impact.
The OP seemed to want to push a brand by saying: "...BRAND I WILL NOT NAME AGAIN e-bike, one of the best company's electric bicycles...". If I had made a statement like that I would feel the need to justify it other than making it my personal opinion without facts and comparisons. It's kind of like passing a coffee shop that states "World's Best Coffee" as an advertisement hook. I have done advertising and marketing for others, as well as for one of my previous businesses and I am well aware of the differences. Essentially, when it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck; it's a DUCK!.
In the "E-bike Adventures: A new perspective on travelling" thread, the same OP almost immediately brings up his "BRAND I WILL NOT NAME AGAIN" bike like it is the only bike out there, and in a later post he again singles out "BRAND I WILL NOT NAME AGAIN" in a direct marketing manner stating: "One of the best things about e-bikes, especially BRAND I WILL NOT NAME AGAIN E-bikes...". Like I said; a duck! Why would you use the term "especially" unless you have comparative knowledge regarding other brands' models.
Another poster in the "E-bike Adventures" post almost immediately goes off-topic making a statement about the high cost of e-bikes, but then says how affordable his "BRAND I WILL NOT NAME AGAIN" e-bike is. This is a commonly used tactic (especially nowadays online) to have multiple entities providing positive feedback and/or exposure of a product. It is easily done by one person who is often just an independent marketing agent working for whatever company pays them. They have no true brand knowledge and are just getting a company's name repeated exposure to potential buyers in a select market; in this case bike riders.
I would have no problem if either poster openly states that they have never ridden any other e-bike, and/or are intentionally plugging a specific brand. There is no way that these general posts that are not initially targeting a specific brand both end up with 2 different posters continually naming the "BRAND I WILL NOT NAME AGAIN" brand; even as a rebuttal to one of my comments. I went to the "BRAND I WILL NOT NAME AGAIN" website and brought forth my concern and received no reply except that they were unavaiable at that time (they have me email, why not answer?).
I am ReapThaWimpWind and I view the world from a plexiglass window in my lower abdomen because my head is a sigmoidoscope always shoved up my....