Have questions or want to discuss cycling? Join Now or Sign In to participate in the BikeRide community.

New: Take Part in the October Giveaway to Win the Qiolor TIGER Retro Electric Bike


Why caliper brakes on road bikes?
#1
Guys,

Why do road bikes always seem to come equipped with caliper brakes (either centre or side pull), yet MTBs have the cantilever style brake? Is it perhaps due to weight?

Dave M, I'm pretty sure you'll know this one Smile.
  Reply
#2
Good question, I'll give it a shot. I think the main reason is weight and their small size. However, some road bikes these days are using cantilever and disc brakes. You won't see v-brakes on a road bike because road levers don't pull enough cable for them.
  Reply
#3
Hi Alex,

Hey quick response! I forgot about disc brakes because my bike is a ten-year-older - 1999 Kona Caldera but still going strong!

For road bikes I know it is important to keep the weight down: well also for MTBs mine weighs in at 27lb with a steel frame (I'm sure the Al frames these days weigh a lot less but maybe a little too ridgy).

I can't really see that there be much difference in weight between the brake types but all counts on a road bike. Just curious as to why this seems to be the (until recently, as you said), the norm...
  Reply
#4
Well if you're going to thrown down the gauntlet, I suppose I HAVE to reply...
I'm sure I don't know the whole history but I'd say:
1. tradition - calipers was the first design that performed well and designers have stayed with them (there was some really goofy designs in the 1800's)
2. simplicity/interchangeability - easier to install and adjust
3. cheaper - when you include the extra frame work required for posts, they're probably a fair bit cheaper
4. more aero
5. they're strong enough - if you can skid the wheel or flip the bike, you don't need stronger brakes anyway
6. lighter - this is probably true if you include the frame posts and the extra strength the frame needs to handle the brake stress with cantis

Can't think of anything else. Some of the reasons for switching to cantis was to give clearance for bigger tires and to allow for better shedding of mud. Those are some of the reasons touring and cyclocross bike have them. Can anyone think of anything else?
  Reply
#5
Yeah, I think people got most of the arguments down. Simpler design means less trouble with them, easier to work on, and so forth. Very light as well. Very easy to find parts for, unless it's a bevel pad setup like I used to have on an old junker MTB I owned where you have to struggle for parts.
Why is it that they make adult bikes that'll generally work for 5'9" or above, yet when you pedal these same bikes they only work for someone who is 5'4" or so?
  Reply
#6
Also, the one bolt design allows for hot swapping during races. V-brakes, canti's etc., all require a post on either side. Calipers don't. One bolt off, slip off old brake, slide on new brake, re tighten. I actually saw a mechanic hanging out a support vehicle window swapping a front brake so the rider didn't have to stop.
Dedicated scholar of bicycles
  Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread
Author
Replies
Views
Last Post
 
Guest
13,699
08-03-2008, 08:12 AM
Last Post: Aushiker

Forum Jump:

[-]
10 Latest Posts
Moving in Style: Beyond Regular Transpor...
Today 03:01 PM
Bike bus
Today 01:29 PM
Great UK Cycle Camping Map, For E-Bikes,...
11-10-2024 06:55 AM
Cycling is Anti-Aging, But There's a Cat...
11-10-2024 06:48 AM
BAGGI 1936(?)
11-09-2024 10:24 AM
Do you have a four foot rule?
11-09-2024 10:10 AM
Trek domane tyre
11-08-2024 05:07 PM
Greetings!
11-08-2024 04:39 PM
Peugeot Nouveau Folder
11-08-2024 04:34 PM
Community Discussion Cycling Myths
11-07-2024 09:05 PM

[-]
Join BikeRide on Strava
Feel free to join if you are on Strava: www.strava.com/clubs/bikeridecom

[-]
Top 5 Posters This Month
no avatar 1. enkei
22 posts
no avatar 2. GirishH
17 posts
no avatar 3. Jesper
17 posts
no avatar 4. Flowrider
13 posts
no avatar 5. Talha
10 posts